There is no single answer to this question, as it depends on each author's individual goals and preferences. Some authors may prefer the greater control and higher royalties they can receive through self-publishing, while others may prefer the heightened visibility and credibility that comes with being published by a traditional publisher.
There are pros and cons to both traditional and self-publishing, so it's important to weigh your options and decide what's best for you and your book.
Here are some things to consider when making your decision:
-Are you interested in having complete control over the publication process, from cover design to pricing to distribution? If so, self-publishing may be the way to go.
-Do you want the validation and credibility that comes with being traditionally published? If so, then traditional publishing may be a better fit.
-Are you willing to invest time and money into promoting your book? Self-published authors typically have to do more legwork when it comes to marketing and promoting their books, as they don't have the built-in platform that a traditional publisher can provide.
-What is your ultimate goal for your book? If you're hoping to land a book deal with a major publisher down the road, it's generally best to start with a traditional publisher. However, if you're happy with self-publishing and have no interest in going the traditional route, then self-publishing may be the best option for you.
Ultimately, the best way to decide whether to traditionally publish or self-publish is to educate yourself on the pros and cons of both options and make a decision based on your specific goals and needs.
