There's no definitive answer to this question since it depends on each individual's publishing goals and preferences. Some authors may find that hybrid publishing is the best option for them, while others may prefer traditional or self-publishing. It really varies from person to person.
That being said, hybrid publishing does have some advantages. One benefit is that it can offer authors a greater degree of control over their work than traditional publishing. With hybrid publishing, authors retain the rights to their work and can make decisions about how and where it's published. They also typically receive a larger share of the royalties.
Another advantage of hybrid publishing is that it can offer authors a greater degree of flexibility. For example, if an author wants to self-publish their work but doesn't want to go through the hassle of doing everything themselves, they can work with a hybrid publisher. The publisher will take care of tasks like editing, marketing, and distribution, while the author retains creative control.
There are also some disadvantages to hybrid publishing. One downside is that hybrid publishers may not have the same reach or resources as traditional publishers. This can make it harder to get your work noticed and make it difficult to sell copies.
Another potential downside is that some hybrid publishers charge authors for their services. This means that you may have to pay to have your work edited, formatted, and distributed. This can be expensive, and it's important to make sure that you're getting value for your money.
Overall, hybrid publishing is a good option for some authors, but it's not right for everyone. It's important to think about your goals and preferences before you decide which publishing route to take.
