There's no simple answer to this question; it really depends on your individual situation. Generally speaking, traditional publishing can have advantages over self-publishing, such as a professional editorial and production process, access to established distribution channels and the potential for greater recognition. On the other hand, publishing traditionally often involves surrendering control over the publishing process and significant financial costs.
Ultimately, it boils down to weighing the pros and cons of each option. You'll want to consider the audience you want to reach, the type of support you need with the publishing process, and what sort of financial investment you're willing to make. If traditional publishing meets your needs in these areas, then it could still be worth a try. However, if traditional publishing does not seem to be the most advantageous choice for you, self-publishing could offer more flexibility and control.